Currently our Sunday morning study group is examining the Old Testament book of Daniel. This books takes place during the Babylonian captivity of the Israelite people. It contains classic accounts such as Daniel and the Lion’s den and the three men in the fiery furnace. Join us on Sunday morning four our round table discussion. Or, use the link below to download a PDF of our handout.
To DOWNLOAD the “Daniel 3” Bible Class handout, first right click here then choose "save link as" or "save target as".
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Daniel Chapter I-II, Nov 22, 2009
Currently our Sunday morning study group is examining the Old Testament book of Daniel. This books takes place during the Babylonian captivity of the Israelite people. It contains classic accounts such as Daniel and the Lion’s den and the three men in the fiery furnace. Join us on Sunday morning four our round table discussion. Or, use the link below to download a PDF of our handout.
To DOWNLOAD the “Daniel 1-2” Bible Class handout, first right click here then choose "save link as" or "save target as".
To DOWNLOAD the “Daniel 1-2” Bible Class handout, first right click here then choose "save link as" or "save target as".
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Tattoos and the Bible, Nov 1, 2009
Tattooing is putting ink into the skin in order to create a permanent mark. Historically this has been done for many reasons. These reasons range nearly as wide as the human imagination. Some have claimed tattoos create a connection between them and the spiritual world. Others regard them as mere bodily decoration. So what does the Bible say about tattoos?
The Bible says almost nothing directly about tattoos. A Hebrew phrase which might refer to a “tattoo” is found in Leviticus 19:28. A Greek word which definitely can be used to refer to a tattoo is found in Galatians 6:17. These are the only verses in the Bible, of which I am aware, which directly speak about tattoos. Lets look at them both in more detail.
Leviticus 19:29
A more word-for-word translation of this passage would read:
The word translated “mark” is quite common. It’s the noun used for any impression, inscription, or a mark that might be made. The word translated “cut” is a bit harder to define. It is used only here in the Old Testament. It is believed to come from a root word meaning “to cut off”.
Galatians 6:17
The word that is here translated “marks” refers to a “mark or brand” . In the Graeco-Roman world this was usually not a good thing. See the following:
Nobody actually thinks Paul is referring to a religious ink tattoo in Galatians 6:17. Most believe Paul is referring to scars he has received because of his faithful preaching of the Good News of Jesus Christ. These he holds up as the “ownership marks” of Christ, his master, as opposed to the Judaizer’s cherished mark – circumcision.
In Leviticus and in Galatians, no ink is mentioned. Nor does it matter for our study here. The point is that a mark is created. It makes no difference whether that mark is visible because of ink or because of scar tissue.
The Freedom of the New Testament Era
In the Old Testament, God gave the nation of Israel three types of Law. Ceremonial Law, how they were to worship Him. Civic Law, how the nation was to be governed and Moral Law, how God wanted them to treat Him and each other.
Many of the Old Testament laws were specifically intended to set the Israelites apart from neighboring pagan nations (see Deuteronomy 14:21). The great heaping up of laws to keep was also intended to show the Israelite people how sinful they were, and how desperately they needed the promised Messiah.
After the Messiah came, God made it clear through his apostles that many of these Old Testament laws had served their purpose and no longer needed to be carried out by the followers of God.
Generally speaking Old Testament Ceremonial Laws and Civic Laws no longer apply to the followers of God. The Moral Law, however, stands forever as God’s will for mankind. The moral law is generally summarized in the Ten Commandments (But even there, in the third commandment, we find a specific worship law given to the Jews about the Sabbath day).
Is the command given in Leviticus 19:28 one of the prohibitions meant to set the Israelites apart, or was intended to apply to all people of all time? Is this command part of the Ceremonial Law, the Civic Law, or the Moral Law? Let’s look at the context. Read through the chapter and identify each command as either:
Surrounding Practices: A Closer Look
Some culturally different practices are mentioned here.
Both of these were done in connection with mourning for the dead.
Whatever motivated these men to cut themselves, we know that the priests of Baal did it in order to get the attention or the good favor of their god.
Regardless of the customs of other nations the Israelites were not to do these things. They were to be different than the other nations, for they were His nation from which the Messiah would come.
Back to Tattoos
1 Corinthians 6:19 speaks of the moral crime of uniting one’s body with a prostitute and puts and exclamation point on the argument since the body is the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit. Paul calls it the “Temple” of God.
The main focus of the Scripture is to build Christians up in faith and train them in righteousness. Proper care of the human body is part of Christian life. It enables us to do His work. It is proper stewardship of God’s gift of a body.
However, Paul’s point in calling the body the “Temple of God” is that the Holy Spirit it there, not that we are being called to hit our target weight and increase our flexibility.
It’s not hard to see Paul’s focus is more squarely placed on spiritual growth and maturity, not physical.
1 Corinthians 9:27 reminds us that the body is also in need of discipline (same word for “body” is used. “Soma”).
CONCLUSIONS:
A Christian who wants to get a tattoo may ask the question, “What does the Bible say about tattoos? Does the Bible say that getting a tattoo is morally wrong?”
So, if tattoos are not inherently evil, I should get a tattoo? Maybe, maybe not.
Author Lorne Zelyck lists a number of compelling questions that a Christian might consider before getting a tattoo.
The Bible says almost nothing directly about tattoos. A Hebrew phrase which might refer to a “tattoo” is found in Leviticus 19:28. A Greek word which definitely can be used to refer to a tattoo is found in Galatians 6:17. These are the only verses in the Bible, of which I am aware, which directly speak about tattoos. Lets look at them both in more detail.
Leviticus 19:29
“28You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the Lord” Leviticus 19:28 (NKJV).
A more word-for-word translation of this passage would read:
“…and a mark cut not ye shall put on yourselves. I am Jehovah” (personal translation).
The word translated “mark” is quite common. It’s the noun used for any impression, inscription, or a mark that might be made. The word translated “cut” is a bit harder to define. It is used only here in the Old Testament. It is believed to come from a root word meaning “to cut off”.
Galatians 6:17
“12Those who want to make a good impression outwardly are trying to compel you to be circumcised. The only reason they do this is to avoid being persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13Not even those who are circumcised obey the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your flesh. 14May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is a new creation. 16Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule, even to the Israel of God.
17Finally, let no one cause me trouble, for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus” (Galatians 6:12-17 NIV).
The word that is here translated “marks” refers to a “mark or brand” . In the Graeco-Roman world this was usually not a good thing. See the following:
“People who are branded, e.g., criminals, prisoners of war, slaves, or deserters, are usually regarded as dishonored and are a butt of scorn in comedy. Caligula even has some citizens branded and sent to prison camps. Various devices are tried to remove the brands but without much success. Tattooed signs are placed on army recruits, usually on the hand” (Theological dictionary of the New Testament).
Nobody actually thinks Paul is referring to a religious ink tattoo in Galatians 6:17. Most believe Paul is referring to scars he has received because of his faithful preaching of the Good News of Jesus Christ. These he holds up as the “ownership marks” of Christ, his master, as opposed to the Judaizer’s cherished mark – circumcision.
In Leviticus and in Galatians, no ink is mentioned. Nor does it matter for our study here. The point is that a mark is created. It makes no difference whether that mark is visible because of ink or because of scar tissue.
The Freedom of the New Testament Era
“16So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, 17which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ” Colossians 2:16-17 (NIV).
“11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”
14“Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”
15The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean”” (Acts 10:9-15 NIV).
In the Old Testament, God gave the nation of Israel three types of Law. Ceremonial Law, how they were to worship Him. Civic Law, how the nation was to be governed and Moral Law, how God wanted them to treat Him and each other.
Many of the Old Testament laws were specifically intended to set the Israelites apart from neighboring pagan nations (see Deuteronomy 14:21). The great heaping up of laws to keep was also intended to show the Israelite people how sinful they were, and how desperately they needed the promised Messiah.
After the Messiah came, God made it clear through his apostles that many of these Old Testament laws had served their purpose and no longer needed to be carried out by the followers of God.
Generally speaking Old Testament Ceremonial Laws and Civic Laws no longer apply to the followers of God. The Moral Law, however, stands forever as God’s will for mankind. The moral law is generally summarized in the Ten Commandments (But even there, in the third commandment, we find a specific worship law given to the Jews about the Sabbath day).
Is the command given in Leviticus 19:28 one of the prohibitions meant to set the Israelites apart, or was intended to apply to all people of all time? Is this command part of the Ceremonial Law, the Civic Law, or the Moral Law? Let’s look at the context. Read through the chapter and identify each command as either:
· Civic Law
· Ceremonial Law
· Moral Law (Also identify which commandment it fits under)
Surrounding Practices: A Closer Look
“27You shall not shave around the sides of your head, nor shall you disfigure the edges of your beard. 28You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the Lord” (Leviticus 19:27-28 NKJV).
Some culturally different practices are mentioned here.
· Shaving the sides of the head and “trimming” the beard
· Cutting your own flesh for the dead
Both of these were done in connection with mourning for the dead.
“10 I will turn your religious feasts into mourning
and all your singing into weeping.
I will make all of you wear sackcloth
and shave your heads.
I will make that time like mourning for an only son
and the end of it like a bitter day” (Amos 8:10 NIV).
“4The day after Gedaliah’s assassination, before anyone knew about it, 5eighty men who had shaved off their beards, torn their clothes and cut themselves came from Shechem, Shiloh and Samaria, bringing grain offerings and incense with them to the house of the LORD” (Jeremiah 41:4-5 NIV).
Whatever motivated these men to cut themselves, we know that the priests of Baal did it in order to get the attention or the good favor of their god.
“27And at noon Elijah mocked them, saying, "Cry aloud, for he is a god. Either he is musing, or he is relieving himself, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened." 28And they cried aloud and cut themselves after their custom with swords and lances, until the blood gushed out upon them” (2 Kings 18: 27-28 ESV).
Regardless of the customs of other nations the Israelites were not to do these things. They were to be different than the other nations, for they were His nation from which the Messiah would come.
“1“You are the children of the Lord your God; you shall not cut yourselves nor shave the front of your head for the dead. 2For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples who are on the face of the earth” (Deuteronomy 14:1-2 NKJV).
“5“‘Priests must not shave their heads or shave off the edges of their beards or cut their bodies. 6They must be holy to their God and must not profane the name of their God. Because they present the offerings made to the LORD by fire, the food of their God, they are to be holy.
7“‘They must not marry women defiled by prostitution or divorced from their husbands, because priests are holy to their God. 8Regard them as holy, because they offer up the food of your God. Consider them holy, because I the LORD am holy—I who make you holy” (Leviticus 21:5-8 NIV).
Back to Tattoos
1 Corinthians 6:19 speaks of the moral crime of uniting one’s body with a prostitute and puts and exclamation point on the argument since the body is the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit. Paul calls it the “Temple” of God.
“12“Everything is permissible for me”—but not everything is beneficial. “Everything is permissible for me”—but I will not be mastered by anything. 13“Food for the stomach and the stomach for food”—but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also. 15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.” 17But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
18Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. 19Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body” (1 Corinthians 6:12-20 NIV).
“16Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are” (1 Corinthians 3:16-17).
The main focus of the Scripture is to build Christians up in faith and train them in righteousness. Proper care of the human body is part of Christian life. It enables us to do His work. It is proper stewardship of God’s gift of a body.
However, Paul’s point in calling the body the “Temple of God” is that the Holy Spirit it there, not that we are being called to hit our target weight and increase our flexibility.
“6If you point these things out to the brothers, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, brought up in the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed. 7Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives’ tales; rather, train yourself to be godly. 8For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come.
9This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance 10(and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe.
11Command and teach these things. 12Don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity. 13Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching and to teaching. 14Do not neglect your gift, which was given you through a prophetic message when the body of elders laid their hands on you” (1 Timothy 4: NIV).
It’s not hard to see Paul’s focus is more squarely placed on spiritual growth and maturity, not physical.
1 Corinthians 9:27 reminds us that the body is also in need of discipline (same word for “body” is used. “Soma”).
“24Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may obtain it. 25And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown, but we for an imperishable crown. 26Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified” (1 Corinthians 9:24-27 NIV).
CONCLUSIONS:
A Christian who wants to get a tattoo may ask the question, “What does the Bible say about tattoos? Does the Bible say that getting a tattoo is morally wrong?”
· For an Old Testament Jew – it was wrong to get tattooed. It made a mark in the flesh, a thing which God told them not to do (Leviticus 19:28).
· The Old Testament prohibition against marking the flesh was part of the law that set the Israelites apart from other nations, not part of the moral law which is permanent.
· The prohibition against marking the body has not been reiterated in the New Testament. Therefore, for the New Testament Christian – getting a tattoo is not prohibited.
So, if tattoos are not inherently evil, I should get a tattoo? Maybe, maybe not.
Author Lorne Zelyck lists a number of compelling questions that a Christian might consider before getting a tattoo.
“1. What is your motivation for getting a tattoo? If you got a tattoo, would it violate your conscience or the conscience of your family members, friends, and fellow believers in Christ? Would this tattoo be considered by others as aesthetically pleasing? Is it legal in your state and at your age to be tattooed?”
2. Could this tattoo permanently harm your body? Is the tattoo parlor you go too certified? Is it clean? Have you seen other tattoos which your artist has done? How long have you thought about getting this particular symbol? Are you prepared to have this symbol marked on your body permanently? Are you addicted to tattoos? Are you able to not get the tattoo?
3. What will your parents think of your tattoo? If you are married, what would your spouse think? What would your fellow church members think? Is your tattoo auspicious? Are you able to cover it up? How will you feel about your tattoo in 10 years? 50 years? Will this tattoo hinder future relationships? Will this tattoo prevent you from getting a job in the future? Will this tattoo prevent you from accomplishing God’s will for your life?
4. What is the meaning of your tattoo? Does it symbolize a Biblical truth? Would God be honored by this tattoo? Does this tattoo symbolize something which is relevant to your relationship with Christ? Would this tattoo benefit or hinder your relationship with Christ?” (“The (Im)Morality of Tattoos”, by Lorne Zelyck).
“23“Everything is permissible”—but not everything is beneficial. “Everything is permissible”—but not everything is constructive. 24Nobody should seek his own good, but the good of others” (1 Corinthians 10:23-24 NIV).
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Homosexuality and the Bible
RESPONSE TO MEL WHITE
This is written partially in response to Mel White’s “What the Bible Says – And Doesn’t Say – About Homosexuality”. Mel White was a ghost-writer for a number of big-wig Christian evangelists. He had problems with same-sex attraction, and after years of failed attempts to “exterminate his homosexuality” he accepted that he will always be a homosexual and that sexual identity is acceptable in God’s eyes. He has since gone on to organize and lead openly homosexual churches.
Mel White begins his paper by stating his credentials. He says that he has more than 50 years of experience in reading, studying, memorizing, preaching, and teaching from the sacred texts. He’s got a master’s and doctoral degrees from a conservative biblical seminary. He’s learned Hebrew and Greek for working with the original texts of the Bible. One wonders how he can miss the obvious context surrounding some of the passages that he interprets incorrectly.
He has not arrived at the conviction that homosexuality is okay by studying the Bible. He has decided that since he has the feelings and desires of a homosexual man – those feelings and desires, in part at least, define him as a person. But he was a Christian first, and has no desire to abandon that part of himself. So he has decided to twist and re-interpret the Bible to fit his feelings, desires and actions.
White therefore attempts to explain away Bible testimony. He does this in numerous of ways. Here are a few of the ways White attempts to explain away the passages condemning homosexual practice.
· The Bible’s prohibitions against homosexual activity are outdated “holiness rules” that apply only to other people (like Old Testament priests), and not to regular people.
· God’s judgment on homosexual people was actually because of OTHER sins they committed, not because of their sexual actions.
· Mysterious customs from the ancient world underlie the actual words of the Bible passages concerning homosexual activity. These customs make it possible to re-interpret passages in a way that points the guilt away from homosexual activity.
But some of the passages are so clear that he cannot explain them away. White reveals the true origin of his conclusions by saying that the Holy Spirit sometimes speaks through modern science and personal experience to show us which things from the Old Testament are outdated and no longer applicable to us. He states,
“There is a growing body of evidence from science, psychology, history, psychiatry, medicine, and personal experience that leads to a clear verdict: Homosexuality is neither a sickness nor a sin. Unfortunately, the church has always been slow, if not the last institution on earth , to accept new truth” (“What the Bible Says – and Doesn’t Say – about Homosexuality”, Mel White).
Mel White says that the sinful world has known the truth for years and years, but this truth from God has remained a mystery to most of God’s people.
So, is Mel White right? Has the church just got it wrong all this time? What does the Bible really say when allowed to speak for itself? Let’s find out.
GOD SPEAKS ABOUT SEXUALITY
When God speaks about sexual relationships acceptable to Him, he doesn’t ever talk about men with men and women with women. If homosexuality is really acceptable to God, this is puzzling, because He certainly speaks about sexuality between men and women.
“1Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry. 2But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion” (1 Cor. 7:1-9 NIV).
In the Greek the word “aner” is used both for “man” and husband “husband”. Like a woman might say today, “He’s my man”. The word “gunae” is used both for “woman” and “wife”.
While the Bible is not primarily about human sexuality, God does speak about human sexuality in the Bible. He talks about misuses of sex like adultery, fornication and bestiality. He talks about temptation to sexual sin and how having a spouse helps to avoid sexual sin. Sex is rightfully enjoyed only in the marriage bed. It is God’s MARRIAGE gift.
“4Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.” (Hebrews 13:4 NIV).
God also speaks directly about homosexual relations.
Genesis 19:1-14 (NKJV) Sodom and Gomorrah
1Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them, and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground. 2And he said, “Here now, my lords, please turn in to your servant’s house and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise early and go on your way.”
And they said, “No, but we will spend the night in the open square.”
3But he insisted strongly; so they turned in to him and entered his house. Then he made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate.
4Now before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the people from every quarter, surrounded the house. 5And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.”
6So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, 7and said, “Please, my brethren, do not do so wickedly! 8See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men, since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof.”
9And they said, “Stand back!” Then they said, “This one came in to stay here, and he keeps acting as a judge; now we will deal worse with you than with them.” So they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break down the door. 10But the men reached out their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. 11And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.
▬
Mel White declares that the sin which brought judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah was primarily a greedy, selfish and uncaring attitude toward others. He bases this on the following passage from Ezekiel.
“48“As I live,” says the Lord GOD, “neither your sister Sodom nor her daughters have done as you and your daughters have done. 49Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy (Ezekiel 16:48-49 NKJV).
Certainly this passage speaks of the people of Sodom as selfish. But that wasn’t their only sin. White ignores Jude 1:7 which says,
“7In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 1:7 NIV).
He also fails to mention 2 Peter 2 which says,
“4For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 5and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; 7and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked 8(for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds)—9then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, 10and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority. They are presumptuous, self-willed. They are not afraid to speak evil of dignitaries, 11whereas angels, who are greater in power and might, do not bring a reviling accusation against them before the Lord” (2 Peter 2:4-10 NKJV).
Amazingly, White attempts to redefine “sodomy” as “selfishness”. Look up “sodomy” in a dictionary and see what it has meant in language after language ever since the actual city of Sodom was destroyed. The term “sodomy” does not refer to “selfishness” but primarily to anal sexual intercourse between men.
Lastly, look at the passage which comes directly after the passage White quotes. It has a very important word in it.
“50And they were haughty and committed abomination before Me; therefore I took them away as I saw fit” (Ezekiel 16:50 NKJV).
This is the same Hebrew word that is found in the next two references. White speaks some about this word saying that homosexual activity was an “abomination” to the Jews, but that’s not who is talking here. This is God speaking. What the men of Sodom did was an abomination to God.
This brings up the question, what does White believe about the Bible? He says that he takes it seriously, but what I’d like to know is, does he believe that it is God’s Word, authored by the Holy Spirit and written down by man? Does he believe that it is inerrant and inspired? Or does he believe that it is man’s word, containing pious, but human opinion that may change and evolve?
Leviticus 18:22 (NKJV) God’s Moral Law
22You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 (NKJV)
13If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.
White wants to say that these passages are part of a “holiness covenant” applicable only to Old Testament priests. First of all, back up and read the full chapter. Verses 1-5 tell us that this chapter is a message from God for the people of Israel, not just for the priests.
“1Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 2“Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God. 3According to the doings of the land of Egypt, where you dwelt, you shall not do; and according to the doings of the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you, you shall not do; nor shall you walk in their ordinances. 4You shall observe My judgments and keep My ordinances, to walk in them: I am the Lord your God. 5You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man does, he shall live by them: I am the Lord” (Leviticus 18:1-5 NKJV).
White draws attention to the fact that not all laws in the Old Testament are still in effect. This is true. God chose the Israelite people to be His special people. The Messiah would be born from their nation. He gave them three types of Law to follow. Moral Law, which stands for all people for all time. Ceremonial Law, which was how God wanted Israel to worship Him. Civic Law, which was God’s laws for Israel, that, though chosen by Him, was made up of believers and non-believers, wicked and righteous people.
The New Testament tells us which Laws are still in effect for us – those which fall into the category of Moral Law. We don’t have to follow all the Jewish worship laws. Nor are we obligated to follow the Civic Laws meant specifically for Israel.
“13When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, 14having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. 15And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
16Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (Colossians 2:13-17 NIV).
Secondly, look at the stuff around the verse about homosexuality.
“20Moreover you shall not lie carnally with your neighbor’s wife, to defile yourself with her. 21And you shall not let any of your descendants pass through the fire to Molech, nor shall you profane the name of your God: I am the Lord. 22You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. 23Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion” (Lev 18:20-23 NIV).
If these were merely “holiness covenant” than it stands to reason that it would be alright for non-priests to have sex with their neighbor’s wives, sacrifice their children to Molech, and mate themselves with animals.
Also, there weren’t any female priests in ancient Israel, yet the end of verse 23 speaks directly to females. Clearly, White is wrong in teaching that this is a holiness covenant meant only for Old Testament priests.
Furthermore, God explains that these things were not just wicked if Israelites did them, they were wicked if any people did them.
“24“‘Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you” (Lev 18:24-28 NIV).
Romans 1:26-27 Men with Men, Women with Women
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. (Romans 1:26-27 NIV)
All you have to do is read the actual words of the Bible here. Mel White doesn’t really address them. He relies completely on importing meaning into the text. He claims that this section refers to people who made sex their God in pagan temples, and that’s why their actions were bad. But the sentences above are clear enough. Lust and indecent acts - men with men, women with women.
At the end of White’s interpretation of these passages in Romans, white says,
“Even after he describes the disturbing practices he has seen, Paul warns us that judging others is God’s business, not ours”
Truly, God doesn’t want us to judge with outward and shallow perception. But to say that God rules out all judging done by man is just ridiculous.
“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment” (John 7:24 NKJV)
Is it sinfully judging a person to say, “Your having sex with your father’s wife. That’s not right in God’s eyes”?
Is it sinfully judging a person to say, “You’re blaspheming God with your words. That’s not right in God’s eyes”?
Yes this is judgment. But not sinful judgment. And really, not judgment that originates with Christians either. When we hold up God’s Word and judge human lives according to it, God is pronouncing the judgment. Right judgment is made by God’s standard, not by man’s. We are COMMANDED by God to judge those among us who claim to follow Christ, but live opposed to what His Word says.
“9I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.
12For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”” (1 Cor. 5:9-13 NKJV).
“18Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, 19holding on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. 20Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme.” (1 Timothy 1:18-20 NIV).
White says science and experience prove that same sex sexual relations are quite natural. White’s statement here is really, “Man knows better than God.”
The problem is, we live in a broken world. Our natural inclination isn’t necessarily right. Sinners are drawn to all sorts of emotions, desires and behaviors that are not right. Lies, gossip, stealing, hating, lusting – you name it!
Sinners like me and you are naturally inclined to sins – but that doesn’t make them right. We’re naturally inclined to these because we’ve been born in the image of Adam – Sinful. Not knowing God’s will perfectly any longer. We need to look to the Bible for guidance. We walk unstable ground when we allow our feelings and experiences to define what is right instead of relying on God’s Word.
1 Corinthians 6:9 (NIV) Mysterious Words?
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
▬
White claims that the two words underlined above are mysterious words which have been assigned the meaning “homosexual” but really nobody knows for sure what they mean. Really?
The first word is translated “male prostitutes” in the NIV. This word is used to refer both to things and people. When used of things it means, “soft”. For example, it is used in Luke 7:25 by Jesus.
“25But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft garments? Indeed those who are gorgeously appareled and live in luxury are in kings’ courts” (Luke 7:25 NKJV).
But this adjective is also used of people. What does it mean to be a “soft” person? Well, look at the context first of all. It’s a sinful thing, whatever it is. And it comes sandwiched between terms for sexual sin: sexual immorality, adultery and homosexual acts.
It is true that sometimes a word is difficult to define because it is seldom used in ancient literature. However, the most trustworthy lexicon of Koine Greek has the following entry for this word,
“Soft. 1) of things: clothes 2) of pers. Soft, effeminate, esp. of catamites, men and boys who allow themselves to be misused homosexually” (“malakos” entry in “A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature” Bauer, Gingrich and Danker)
Other lexicons support this definition. It’s also important to remember here that many if not most of the men and women who specialize in Biblical languages are NOT Christians. The study of Bible languages is a job for them, not a conviction. They come to these definitions primarily on the basis of researching words and uses of words in the literature of the period in which it was written and surrounding periods.
White admits the above meaning, but points only to the sexual abuse of children as being the sin – minimizing the fact that this word refers to same sex relations.
The second word which is translated “homosexual offenders” is even clearer. It is a word made by sandwiching two words together. One meaning “male” and one meaning “bed”. The lexicon entry here is,
“a male who practices homosexuality, pederast, sodomite” (“arsenokoitai” entry in “A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature” Bauer, Gingrich and Danker)
Both roles in a homosexual act are spoken of here, both the receiver and the giver.
BUT HOW CAN LOVE BE WRONG?
Love is not wrong. Sex outside of marriage is.
Love is not wrong. Sexual thoughts outside of marriage are.
Love for a person of your same sex is not wrong. Same gender sex acts are.
Christ came to set us free from sin by suffering our punishment for sin on the cross and dying in our place. Faith in Christ means freedom from the fear that God is going to punish us when we fail to keep His Moral Law. Christ means freedom from guilt when we fail to keep His Law. Christ mean freedom FROM sins which enslave and control us, not freedom TO sin.
By faith in Jesus we are placed above the Law. Christ took suffered our punishment on the cross. Our sentence for sin has already been served. But that doesn’t mean we lie and steal and murder and rape and gossip etc. No way! We walk in step with the Holy Spirit – walking according to God’s Moral Law.
Does this mean that we won’t have sexual feelings for inappropriate people? No. We still have Original Sin, the inner traitor, living inside us. He causes all sorts of sinful thoughts and emotions to come from inside. But we also have the New Man inside, created by the Holy Spirit and still assisted by God the Spirit. The New Man fights against the Old Man.
Maybe you believe that you were born a homosexual. That’s fine. Maybe you were. But that doesn’t change God’s Moral Law as expressed in His Word. I was born a sinner. If you knew the things that my mind thinks sometimes you’d be disgusted. Violent things. Perverted things. Petty things. Lustful things. Utterly selfish things. God’s Word tells me these things are not right, even though they come naturally to me, and are sometimes accompanied with intense emotions.
There is help. But there is no “solution” for same sex attraction apart from continued repentance and prayer to God. Continued looking to Jesus for forgiveness and asking God’s Spirit for help. Help to cleanse your thoughts of sexual sin. Help to not put yourself in positions of sexual temptation. Help to align your life according to Jesus’ will and the Holy Spirit’s guiding with His Word.
Can a homosexual be a Christian? Yes. Just as a sinner can be a Christian. But no unrepentant sinner will ever enter heaven. You can’t be cleansed of the sin you clutch in your hand and refuse to let go of. If a homosexual continues to refuse to acknowledge homosexual thoughts and actions are sin, than they have chosen sin over the Savior and God and His Word have no place in their life.
“5This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 6If we claim to have fellowship with him yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live by the truth. 7But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
8If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives” (1 John 1:5-10 NIV).
Caleb Schaller
Pastor, Redemption Lutheran
Lynnwood, WA
This is written partially in response to Mel White’s “What the Bible Says – And Doesn’t Say – About Homosexuality”. Mel White was a ghost-writer for a number of big-wig Christian evangelists. He had problems with same-sex attraction, and after years of failed attempts to “exterminate his homosexuality” he accepted that he will always be a homosexual and that sexual identity is acceptable in God’s eyes. He has since gone on to organize and lead openly homosexual churches.
Mel White begins his paper by stating his credentials. He says that he has more than 50 years of experience in reading, studying, memorizing, preaching, and teaching from the sacred texts. He’s got a master’s and doctoral degrees from a conservative biblical seminary. He’s learned Hebrew and Greek for working with the original texts of the Bible. One wonders how he can miss the obvious context surrounding some of the passages that he interprets incorrectly.
He has not arrived at the conviction that homosexuality is okay by studying the Bible. He has decided that since he has the feelings and desires of a homosexual man – those feelings and desires, in part at least, define him as a person. But he was a Christian first, and has no desire to abandon that part of himself. So he has decided to twist and re-interpret the Bible to fit his feelings, desires and actions.
White therefore attempts to explain away Bible testimony. He does this in numerous of ways. Here are a few of the ways White attempts to explain away the passages condemning homosexual practice.
· The Bible’s prohibitions against homosexual activity are outdated “holiness rules” that apply only to other people (like Old Testament priests), and not to regular people.
· God’s judgment on homosexual people was actually because of OTHER sins they committed, not because of their sexual actions.
· Mysterious customs from the ancient world underlie the actual words of the Bible passages concerning homosexual activity. These customs make it possible to re-interpret passages in a way that points the guilt away from homosexual activity.
But some of the passages are so clear that he cannot explain them away. White reveals the true origin of his conclusions by saying that the Holy Spirit sometimes speaks through modern science and personal experience to show us which things from the Old Testament are outdated and no longer applicable to us. He states,
“There is a growing body of evidence from science, psychology, history, psychiatry, medicine, and personal experience that leads to a clear verdict: Homosexuality is neither a sickness nor a sin. Unfortunately, the church has always been slow, if not the last institution on earth , to accept new truth” (“What the Bible Says – and Doesn’t Say – about Homosexuality”, Mel White).
Mel White says that the sinful world has known the truth for years and years, but this truth from God has remained a mystery to most of God’s people.
So, is Mel White right? Has the church just got it wrong all this time? What does the Bible really say when allowed to speak for itself? Let’s find out.
GOD SPEAKS ABOUT SEXUALITY
When God speaks about sexual relationships acceptable to Him, he doesn’t ever talk about men with men and women with women. If homosexuality is really acceptable to God, this is puzzling, because He certainly speaks about sexuality between men and women.
“1Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry. 2But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion” (1 Cor. 7:1-9 NIV).
In the Greek the word “aner” is used both for “man” and husband “husband”. Like a woman might say today, “He’s my man”. The word “gunae” is used both for “woman” and “wife”.
While the Bible is not primarily about human sexuality, God does speak about human sexuality in the Bible. He talks about misuses of sex like adultery, fornication and bestiality. He talks about temptation to sexual sin and how having a spouse helps to avoid sexual sin. Sex is rightfully enjoyed only in the marriage bed. It is God’s MARRIAGE gift.
“4Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.” (Hebrews 13:4 NIV).
God also speaks directly about homosexual relations.
Genesis 19:1-14 (NKJV) Sodom and Gomorrah
1Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them, and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground. 2And he said, “Here now, my lords, please turn in to your servant’s house and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise early and go on your way.”
And they said, “No, but we will spend the night in the open square.”
3But he insisted strongly; so they turned in to him and entered his house. Then he made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate.
4Now before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the people from every quarter, surrounded the house. 5And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.”
6So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, 7and said, “Please, my brethren, do not do so wickedly! 8See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men, since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof.”
9And they said, “Stand back!” Then they said, “This one came in to stay here, and he keeps acting as a judge; now we will deal worse with you than with them.” So they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break down the door. 10But the men reached out their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. 11And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.
▬
Mel White declares that the sin which brought judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah was primarily a greedy, selfish and uncaring attitude toward others. He bases this on the following passage from Ezekiel.
“48“As I live,” says the Lord GOD, “neither your sister Sodom nor her daughters have done as you and your daughters have done. 49Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy (Ezekiel 16:48-49 NKJV).
Certainly this passage speaks of the people of Sodom as selfish. But that wasn’t their only sin. White ignores Jude 1:7 which says,
“7In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 1:7 NIV).
He also fails to mention 2 Peter 2 which says,
“4For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 5and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; 7and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked 8(for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds)—9then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, 10and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority. They are presumptuous, self-willed. They are not afraid to speak evil of dignitaries, 11whereas angels, who are greater in power and might, do not bring a reviling accusation against them before the Lord” (2 Peter 2:4-10 NKJV).
Amazingly, White attempts to redefine “sodomy” as “selfishness”. Look up “sodomy” in a dictionary and see what it has meant in language after language ever since the actual city of Sodom was destroyed. The term “sodomy” does not refer to “selfishness” but primarily to anal sexual intercourse between men.
Lastly, look at the passage which comes directly after the passage White quotes. It has a very important word in it.
“50And they were haughty and committed abomination before Me; therefore I took them away as I saw fit” (Ezekiel 16:50 NKJV).
This is the same Hebrew word that is found in the next two references. White speaks some about this word saying that homosexual activity was an “abomination” to the Jews, but that’s not who is talking here. This is God speaking. What the men of Sodom did was an abomination to God.
This brings up the question, what does White believe about the Bible? He says that he takes it seriously, but what I’d like to know is, does he believe that it is God’s Word, authored by the Holy Spirit and written down by man? Does he believe that it is inerrant and inspired? Or does he believe that it is man’s word, containing pious, but human opinion that may change and evolve?
Leviticus 18:22 (NKJV) God’s Moral Law
22You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 (NKJV)
13If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.
White wants to say that these passages are part of a “holiness covenant” applicable only to Old Testament priests. First of all, back up and read the full chapter. Verses 1-5 tell us that this chapter is a message from God for the people of Israel, not just for the priests.
“1Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 2“Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God. 3According to the doings of the land of Egypt, where you dwelt, you shall not do; and according to the doings of the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you, you shall not do; nor shall you walk in their ordinances. 4You shall observe My judgments and keep My ordinances, to walk in them: I am the Lord your God. 5You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man does, he shall live by them: I am the Lord” (Leviticus 18:1-5 NKJV).
White draws attention to the fact that not all laws in the Old Testament are still in effect. This is true. God chose the Israelite people to be His special people. The Messiah would be born from their nation. He gave them three types of Law to follow. Moral Law, which stands for all people for all time. Ceremonial Law, which was how God wanted Israel to worship Him. Civic Law, which was God’s laws for Israel, that, though chosen by Him, was made up of believers and non-believers, wicked and righteous people.
The New Testament tells us which Laws are still in effect for us – those which fall into the category of Moral Law. We don’t have to follow all the Jewish worship laws. Nor are we obligated to follow the Civic Laws meant specifically for Israel.
“13When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, 14having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. 15And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
16Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (Colossians 2:13-17 NIV).
Secondly, look at the stuff around the verse about homosexuality.
“20Moreover you shall not lie carnally with your neighbor’s wife, to defile yourself with her. 21And you shall not let any of your descendants pass through the fire to Molech, nor shall you profane the name of your God: I am the Lord. 22You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. 23Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion” (Lev 18:20-23 NIV).
If these were merely “holiness covenant” than it stands to reason that it would be alright for non-priests to have sex with their neighbor’s wives, sacrifice their children to Molech, and mate themselves with animals.
Also, there weren’t any female priests in ancient Israel, yet the end of verse 23 speaks directly to females. Clearly, White is wrong in teaching that this is a holiness covenant meant only for Old Testament priests.
Furthermore, God explains that these things were not just wicked if Israelites did them, they were wicked if any people did them.
“24“‘Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you” (Lev 18:24-28 NIV).
Romans 1:26-27 Men with Men, Women with Women
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. (Romans 1:26-27 NIV)
All you have to do is read the actual words of the Bible here. Mel White doesn’t really address them. He relies completely on importing meaning into the text. He claims that this section refers to people who made sex their God in pagan temples, and that’s why their actions were bad. But the sentences above are clear enough. Lust and indecent acts - men with men, women with women.
At the end of White’s interpretation of these passages in Romans, white says,
“Even after he describes the disturbing practices he has seen, Paul warns us that judging others is God’s business, not ours”
Truly, God doesn’t want us to judge with outward and shallow perception. But to say that God rules out all judging done by man is just ridiculous.
“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment” (John 7:24 NKJV)
Is it sinfully judging a person to say, “Your having sex with your father’s wife. That’s not right in God’s eyes”?
Is it sinfully judging a person to say, “You’re blaspheming God with your words. That’s not right in God’s eyes”?
Yes this is judgment. But not sinful judgment. And really, not judgment that originates with Christians either. When we hold up God’s Word and judge human lives according to it, God is pronouncing the judgment. Right judgment is made by God’s standard, not by man’s. We are COMMANDED by God to judge those among us who claim to follow Christ, but live opposed to what His Word says.
“9I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.
12For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”” (1 Cor. 5:9-13 NKJV).
“18Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, 19holding on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. 20Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme.” (1 Timothy 1:18-20 NIV).
White says science and experience prove that same sex sexual relations are quite natural. White’s statement here is really, “Man knows better than God.”
The problem is, we live in a broken world. Our natural inclination isn’t necessarily right. Sinners are drawn to all sorts of emotions, desires and behaviors that are not right. Lies, gossip, stealing, hating, lusting – you name it!
Sinners like me and you are naturally inclined to sins – but that doesn’t make them right. We’re naturally inclined to these because we’ve been born in the image of Adam – Sinful. Not knowing God’s will perfectly any longer. We need to look to the Bible for guidance. We walk unstable ground when we allow our feelings and experiences to define what is right instead of relying on God’s Word.
1 Corinthians 6:9 (NIV) Mysterious Words?
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
▬
White claims that the two words underlined above are mysterious words which have been assigned the meaning “homosexual” but really nobody knows for sure what they mean. Really?
The first word is translated “male prostitutes” in the NIV. This word is used to refer both to things and people. When used of things it means, “soft”. For example, it is used in Luke 7:25 by Jesus.
“25But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft garments? Indeed those who are gorgeously appareled and live in luxury are in kings’ courts” (Luke 7:25 NKJV).
But this adjective is also used of people. What does it mean to be a “soft” person? Well, look at the context first of all. It’s a sinful thing, whatever it is. And it comes sandwiched between terms for sexual sin: sexual immorality, adultery and homosexual acts.
It is true that sometimes a word is difficult to define because it is seldom used in ancient literature. However, the most trustworthy lexicon of Koine Greek has the following entry for this word,
“Soft. 1) of things: clothes 2) of pers. Soft, effeminate, esp. of catamites, men and boys who allow themselves to be misused homosexually” (“malakos” entry in “A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature” Bauer, Gingrich and Danker)
Other lexicons support this definition. It’s also important to remember here that many if not most of the men and women who specialize in Biblical languages are NOT Christians. The study of Bible languages is a job for them, not a conviction. They come to these definitions primarily on the basis of researching words and uses of words in the literature of the period in which it was written and surrounding periods.
White admits the above meaning, but points only to the sexual abuse of children as being the sin – minimizing the fact that this word refers to same sex relations.
The second word which is translated “homosexual offenders” is even clearer. It is a word made by sandwiching two words together. One meaning “male” and one meaning “bed”. The lexicon entry here is,
“a male who practices homosexuality, pederast, sodomite” (“arsenokoitai” entry in “A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature” Bauer, Gingrich and Danker)
Both roles in a homosexual act are spoken of here, both the receiver and the giver.
BUT HOW CAN LOVE BE WRONG?
Love is not wrong. Sex outside of marriage is.
Love is not wrong. Sexual thoughts outside of marriage are.
Love for a person of your same sex is not wrong. Same gender sex acts are.
Christ came to set us free from sin by suffering our punishment for sin on the cross and dying in our place. Faith in Christ means freedom from the fear that God is going to punish us when we fail to keep His Moral Law. Christ means freedom from guilt when we fail to keep His Law. Christ mean freedom FROM sins which enslave and control us, not freedom TO sin.
By faith in Jesus we are placed above the Law. Christ took suffered our punishment on the cross. Our sentence for sin has already been served. But that doesn’t mean we lie and steal and murder and rape and gossip etc. No way! We walk in step with the Holy Spirit – walking according to God’s Moral Law.
Does this mean that we won’t have sexual feelings for inappropriate people? No. We still have Original Sin, the inner traitor, living inside us. He causes all sorts of sinful thoughts and emotions to come from inside. But we also have the New Man inside, created by the Holy Spirit and still assisted by God the Spirit. The New Man fights against the Old Man.
Maybe you believe that you were born a homosexual. That’s fine. Maybe you were. But that doesn’t change God’s Moral Law as expressed in His Word. I was born a sinner. If you knew the things that my mind thinks sometimes you’d be disgusted. Violent things. Perverted things. Petty things. Lustful things. Utterly selfish things. God’s Word tells me these things are not right, even though they come naturally to me, and are sometimes accompanied with intense emotions.
There is help. But there is no “solution” for same sex attraction apart from continued repentance and prayer to God. Continued looking to Jesus for forgiveness and asking God’s Spirit for help. Help to cleanse your thoughts of sexual sin. Help to not put yourself in positions of sexual temptation. Help to align your life according to Jesus’ will and the Holy Spirit’s guiding with His Word.
Can a homosexual be a Christian? Yes. Just as a sinner can be a Christian. But no unrepentant sinner will ever enter heaven. You can’t be cleansed of the sin you clutch in your hand and refuse to let go of. If a homosexual continues to refuse to acknowledge homosexual thoughts and actions are sin, than they have chosen sin over the Savior and God and His Word have no place in their life.
“5This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 6If we claim to have fellowship with him yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live by the truth. 7But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
8If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives” (1 John 1:5-10 NIV).
Caleb Schaller
Pastor, Redemption Lutheran
Lynnwood, WA
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Were Adam and Eve Real People?
The Bible states clearly, without a doubt, that Adam and Eve were real people. They were not fictional characters like the tortoise and the hare, merely meant to teach a moral lesson. Adam and Eve were the first two human beings. God formed Adam from dirt. A short time later, God formed Eve using part of Adam (a rib). This is all found in Genesis 2.
How can we know for sure? If we believe the Bible is actually God’s testimony written through men but truly authored by God, all we need to do is look to the rest of Scripture. Does the Bible treat Genesis like a parable, or like history?
The History of the Bible is Seamless.
Genesis is primarily a book of historical narrative. It tells how God created the universe. Then how God created Adam and Eve. Then about their children, Cain and Able. Then about their descendants (not all of them) like Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, the nation of Israel, Joshua, Samson, David, Solomon, etc. The history is seamless. That is, there is no distinction which closes off Adam and Eve from the rest of these people. If the later people in this list are real, than so are Adam and Eve. At least, that’s what the Bible’s seamless historical narrative asserts.
Biblical Writers Treat Ancient Bible History as Fact, Not Fiction.
Look up Adam or Eve in a concordance. Nowhere in the Bible are Adam and Eve treated like fictional characters. Always they are actual people who did real things in a real world. Not figurative, but historical.
Genealogies Include Adam As the First Man.
A genealogies in First Chronicles 1 and in Luke 1 include Adam as the first man. The genealogy in Chronicles connects Adam to Abraham and the Jewish people. The genealogy in Luke 1 connects Jesus to Adam. If Jesus was real, so was Adam. At least, that’s what Luke’s genealogy asserts.
We might also add the genealogy in Matthew 1 to this list. It connects Jesus to Abraham, but goes no further. That’s where a Jew would turn to First Chronicles to complete the genealogy to Adam. The main point in Matthew is establishing that Christ was a descendant of Abraham through David’s line, since the prophecies concerning the Christ said this would be true of Him.
Jesus Believed That Adam and Eve Were Real People.
When asked about marriage He responded by referring to the first marriage, that of Adam and Eve.
If Genesis is not literal history, there would be no basis to point to it as the foundation for what marriage is and how it should be treated. Jesus, however, clearly believed Genesis to be literal history.
A Gospel That Has Meaning Requires a Literal Adam and Eve.
According to the Bible death was not part of the world until Adam sinned. According to the Bible Adam’s sin is the reason the Savior was needed! If Adam and Eve are not real, but only figurative characters, where DID death come from? Why the big fuss about sins? If the Genesis account is not to be trusted, what is the real history, and why did God lie about creating a perfect world? God did not lie. According to the Bible, which is God’s eye-witness account preserved by His omnipotent hand, Adam and Eve WERE real people. It was their sin that infected the human race and made the coming of the Savior necessary. In Jesus we have forgiveness for the Originial Sin that we receive from our parents, and for the Actual Sins that we have committed.
Those who suggest Adam and Eve were not real people do not bring their suggestion as the fruit of Bible study, but from some other source.
How can we know for sure? If we believe the Bible is actually God’s testimony written through men but truly authored by God, all we need to do is look to the rest of Scripture. Does the Bible treat Genesis like a parable, or like history?
The History of the Bible is Seamless.
Genesis is primarily a book of historical narrative. It tells how God created the universe. Then how God created Adam and Eve. Then about their children, Cain and Able. Then about their descendants (not all of them) like Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, the nation of Israel, Joshua, Samson, David, Solomon, etc. The history is seamless. That is, there is no distinction which closes off Adam and Eve from the rest of these people. If the later people in this list are real, than so are Adam and Eve. At least, that’s what the Bible’s seamless historical narrative asserts.
Biblical Writers Treat Ancient Bible History as Fact, Not Fiction.
Look up Adam or Eve in a concordance. Nowhere in the Bible are Adam and Eve treated like fictional characters. Always they are actual people who did real things in a real world. Not figurative, but historical.
From Genesis…
“1This is the book of the genealogy of Adam. In the day that God created man, He made him in the likeness of God. 2He created them male and female, and blessed them and called them Mankind in the day they were created. 3And Adam lived one hundred and thirty years, and begot a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth. 4After he begot Seth, the days of Adam were eight hundred years; and he had sons and daughters. 5So all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died.
6Seth lived one hundred and five years, and begot Enosh. 7After he begot Enosh, Seth lived eight hundred and seven years, and had sons and daughters. 8So all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years; and he died.
9Enosh lived ninety years, and begot Cainan.” (Genesis 5:1-9 NKJV).
From Deuteronomy…
“8 When the Most High divided their inheritance to the nations,
When He separated the sons of Adam,
He set the boundaries of the peoples
According to the number of the children of Israel” (Deuteronomy 32:8 NKJV).
From Job…
“33 If I have covered my transgressions as Adam,
By hiding my iniquity in my bosom,” (Job 31:33 NKJV).
From Second Corinthians…
“3But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ” (2 Corinthians 11:3 NIV).
From First Timothy…
“13For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.” (1 Timothy 2:13 NKJV).
From Jude…
“14Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men: “See, the Lord is coming” (Jude 1:14 NIV).
Genealogies Include Adam As the First Man.
A genealogies in First Chronicles 1 and in Luke 1 include Adam as the first man. The genealogy in Chronicles connects Adam to Abraham and the Jewish people. The genealogy in Luke 1 connects Jesus to Adam. If Jesus was real, so was Adam. At least, that’s what Luke’s genealogy asserts.
We might also add the genealogy in Matthew 1 to this list. It connects Jesus to Abraham, but goes no further. That’s where a Jew would turn to First Chronicles to complete the genealogy to Adam. The main point in Matthew is establishing that Christ was a descendant of Abraham through David’s line, since the prophecies concerning the Christ said this would be true of Him.
Jesus Believed That Adam and Eve Were Real People.
When asked about marriage He responded by referring to the first marriage, that of Adam and Eve.
From Matthew…
“3Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
4“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ ? 6So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate”” (Matthew 19:3-6 NIV).
If Genesis is not literal history, there would be no basis to point to it as the foundation for what marriage is and how it should be treated. Jesus, however, clearly believed Genesis to be literal history.
A Gospel That Has Meaning Requires a Literal Adam and Eve.
“21For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:21-22 NKJV).
“12Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned… death reigned from Adam to Moses,” (Romans 5:12 NKJV).
According to the Bible death was not part of the world until Adam sinned. According to the Bible Adam’s sin is the reason the Savior was needed! If Adam and Eve are not real, but only figurative characters, where DID death come from? Why the big fuss about sins? If the Genesis account is not to be trusted, what is the real history, and why did God lie about creating a perfect world? God did not lie. According to the Bible, which is God’s eye-witness account preserved by His omnipotent hand, Adam and Eve WERE real people. It was their sin that infected the human race and made the coming of the Savior necessary. In Jesus we have forgiveness for the Originial Sin that we receive from our parents, and for the Actual Sins that we have committed.
Those who suggest Adam and Eve were not real people do not bring their suggestion as the fruit of Bible study, but from some other source.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
The Largest Lutheran Church, Sep 13, 2009
From the official ELCA Website:
As Lutherans we should note carefully what the ELCA teaches in it’s seminaries and churches. People are likely to associate our church with this synod (more or less) simply because of our common name “Lutheran”. When you become familiar with the range and depth of false teaching tolerated in the ELCA this becomes frightening.
The Following notes are from former ILC Professor David Lau’s comparative religions course. The ELCA seminary textbook often referenced is volume two of “Christian Dogmatics” by Braaten and Jenson. I believe that these references can also be found in the book "What's Going On among the Lutherans?" by Patsy A. Leppien.
Lutheran Divisions Begin Early:
After Luther's death there was a long period of bitter quarreling among his followers. They could not agree among themselves on what the Bible taught or what Luther taught. This quarreling among the Lutherans permitted other groups to gain ground: the Roman Catholics, the Calvinists, and the Anabaptists. Sad to say, one of the chief causes for the quarreling was that Philip Melanchthon, Luther's good friend, did not remain altogether faithful in his teaching. Melanchthon allowed false teaching in the doctrines of conversion and the Lord's Supper, and this led to serious problems.
Finally in 1577 the Formula of Concord was written by Martin Chemnitz (the second Martin) and Jacob Andreae and others as a confession of true Bible teaching on the matters that had been argued about by the Lutherans. Loyal Lutherans were able to unite on the Formula of Concord as a faithful summary of Bible teaching, as Luther had taught it. Those Lutherans that truly accept the Formula of Concord can be called orthodox Lutherans or confessional Lutherans.
Although Luther himself taught the difference between church and government, the Lutheran churches in Germany and Norway and Denmark and Sweden became churches that were supported and partly controlled by the government. This worked out all right as long as the rulers themselves were orthodox Lutherans. But in the long run the close bond between church and state proved to be a negative factor that hurt the cause of Lutheranism in Europe.
Today these European countries list millions of persons calling themselves Lutherans, but only a very small percentage actually participate in worship or actively confess their faith. There are also some Lutheran free churches in Europe, but these too are no longer faithful to the teachings of the Bible.
What went wrong between 1577 and 1999? At first the teaching was orthodox and confessional, but not enough emphasis was placed on living the Christian life and practicing Christian discipline (admonition, excommunication).
Then, in an effort to improve the Christian life, there arose the Lutheran pietists, who were something like the Methodists in England in their emphasis on holy living. The pietists believed that the teaching of true doctrine was relatively unimportant. What counted was deeds, not creeds. Unfortunately the pietists made rules for holy living that went beyond the Bible. For example, playing cards was considered sinful by the pietists.
The pietists were followed by the rationalists who were especially strong in the late 1700s and early 1800s. The rationalists were willing to accept only those Bible teachings that agreed with their reason. But when you omit the miracles from Scripture, there is very little left.
In the late 1800s and early 1900s there was a resurgence of confessional Lutheranism in Europe and America, but at this time in history (2003) there is very little confessional Lutheranism alive anywhere in the world. The following basic Bible teachings are being denied in full or in part by the vast majority of Lutherans in the world today:
According to a Barna Group poll (Modern Reformation, May-June 2002) only 21% of Lutherans nationwide agree that people do not earn their way to heaven by their good works. Only 33% of Lutherans believe that Jesus was without sin.
What we teach at Immanuel Lutheran College in Eau Claire on the basis of the Bible and in agreement with our Lutheran confessions is not taught by many Lutherans in the world today.
Lesson 35
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA)
Lutherans began to come to America as early as 1624. They settled in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York at first, later in Georgia and South Carolina and the upper midwest: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, North Dakota. Some of the Lutheran settlers were confessional Lutherans, but most of them were greatly influenced by pietism and rationalism. One of the early leaders was Henry Melchior Muhlenberg, who organized some of the early Lutherans into a church body.
There have been many different Lutheran church bodies in America through the years: General Synod, Tennessee Synod, Ohio Synod, General Council, Iowa Synod, Norwegian Synod, Augustana Synod, American Lutheran Church. But today the majority of Lutherans are found in one very large church body known as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), which began its existence in 1988. The membership of the ELCA is 5,038,006, with 17,706 clergy. Most of the large Lutheran congregations in Eau Claire are members of the ELCA: First Lutheran, Grace Lutheran, Trinity Lutheran, St. John's Lutheran, Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd, Immanuel Lutheran, Hope Lutheran, Our Savior's Lutheran. In Canada the largest Lutheran church body is the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada (ELCIC), which has 199,236 members, with 866 clergy. This church body also tolerates all kinds of false teaching and ungodly behavior.
The ELCA claims that it is a Lutheran church and that it honors the Lutheran confessions. But what is actually taught and practiced by these churches is not confessional Lutheranism. Several recent books supply the evidence that the ELCA is a grossly false-teaching church body. The information printed in the following paragraphs is taken mainly from two books: What's Going On Among the Lutherans? (1992) and WELS and Other Lutherans (1995).
The Inspiration and Inerrancy of Scripture:
The Bible itself teaches that all Scripture has been breathed out by God and is therefore inspired. Since all of Scripture is God's Word, it is clear that all of it is true. There are no errors or contradictions in the Bible. We therefore confess that the Bible is God's Word; to say merely that the Bible contains God's Word is insufficient.
The dominant position in the ELCA is that there are human errors and contradictions in the Bible. We may call the Bible "inspired" but we may also call the traditions of the church "inspired" or the testimony of Christians today "inspired." When the ELCA was organized, its founders very carefully and deliberately left out any reference to the Bible as the "inerrant" Word of God. None of its seminary teachers or leaders proclaim that the Bible is truth in everything that it says. This, of course, influences everything else that the ELCA does. When a doctrinal controversy arises, the ELCA has no final court of appeal, that is, no inerrant Bible from which to draw its teachings and practices.
An ELCA textbook indicates what is being taught in ELCA schools: "Today it is impossible to assume the historicity of the things recorded. What the biblical authors report is not accepted as a literal transcript of the factual course of events. Therefore, critical scholars inquire behind the text and attempt to reconstruct the real history that took place."
Creation:
The Bible teaches that God created all things, including man, in six ordinary days. Therefore to say that man evolved from lower forms of life is plainly contrary to Scripture. It is also clear from Scripture that Adam and Eve were real persons, and that their fall into sin took place just as Genesis describes it.
Most ELCA teachers, however, consider the story of creation in Genesis to be a myth. That is, it is a nice story to try to explain how we got here, but, of course, it did not really happen. The ELCA tolerates and even promotes the concept of theistic evolution: that is, that God created things by means of evolution. Adam and Eve are presented as symbols of humanity, not real people. Other stories in the Bible, such as the stories of Noah, Jonah, and Job are also myths intended to teach some moral lesson. Of course, they are not factual.
The Five Books of Moses:
Jesus Himself taught that the first five books of the Bible were written by Moses.
The ELCA, however, is dominated by teachers who believe that the first five books of the Bible were written centuries after Moses died. They follow the so-called historical-critical approach, which claims that the first five books of the Bible and later books as well were derived from various sources commonly identified as J, E, D, and P.
The Words of Jesus:
As disciples of Christ, we of course believe that Jesus actually said all the statements attributed to Him in the New Testament. He Himself said that He would give the Holy Spirit to His apostles to remind them of the things He had said to them, so that we might know them and come to faith in Christ through these words.
Many teachers in the ELCA, however, take the position that most of the statements attributed to Jesus in the Gospels were not actually spoken by Him but were added to the Bible by early Christians in their desire to honor their Lord. Of course, this means in plain English that they were liars. Perhaps you have heard of the "Jesus Seminar." This is a group of scholars who are putting out a book of five Gospels (including a Gospel of Thomas with the usual four) that claim to separate the real teachings of Jesus from the teachings that are found in the Gospels. These scholars have concluded, for example, that the only word of the Lord's Prayer that Jesus actually said was the word "Father." The ELCA also is represented among the scholars of the "Jesus Seminar."
The Virgin Birth of Christ:
The Bible teaches clearly that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, and that therefore He did not have a biological father on this earth.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the view that Jesus was not born of a virgin, but that later Christians ascribed His birth to a virgin in order to honor His name. The real facts in the story are that Joseph may have been His father, or perhaps a Roman soldier was His father. The ELCA textbook says about the virgin birth: "It is important not to get bogged down in biology, but to read it as a symbol witnessing the truth of the kerygma."
The Deity of Christ:
The Bible teaches clearly in many places that Jesus is God, even as we confess in the Nicene Creed.
Many in the ELCA, however, are willing to concede that the doctrine of Jesus' deity is not taught in the Bible but that it was a doctrine developed by the early Christians in order to honor Jesus. On this point the ELCA textbook says: "The notion of the preexistent Son of God becoming a human being in the womb of a virgin and then returning to his heavenly home is bound up with the mythological picture of the world that clashes with our modern scientific world view." And again the textbook says: "The preexistence of Christ is an integral part of the myth of the incarnation." We have to realize that when ELCA theologians talk about Jesus being God, they do not really mean that Jesus was and is true God from all eternity. They mean only that He is given the name of God in order to honor Him as someone special.
The Atonement:
We believe, as the Bible teaches, that God punished Jesus on the cross in our place. Jesus died for our sins as our Substitute. God forgives us our sins for Christ's sake, that is, because Jesus died in our place. Jesus was our Substitute also in His life, keeping the law of God and being perfectly obedient throughout His life.
Many ELCA theologians, however, teach only that Jesus died for us as a man might die for his friends. They do not want to think that God would be so "unjust" as to punish Jesus for our sins. One ELCA theologian taught in an ELCA textbook: "Jesus came and died because God is merciful, not to make God merciful. We killed him because he forgave sins, not to make forgiveness possible."
The Resurrection:
The tomb was empty on Sunday morning, because Jesus rose physically from the dead and showed Himself alive to His disciples. Our bodies also will rise from the dead on the Last Day.
Some ELCA teachers, however, present Jesus' resurrection as a spiritual resurrection, not as a physical resurrection. Whether the tomb was empty or not is no concern to them. They would maintain that we can believe in Jesus' resurrection even if His body remains in its tomb. One graduate from an ELCA seminary claims that when he graduated from the seminary, he did not believe in Jesus' physical resurrection, nor did most of his classmates, nor did any of his teachers. The Bible, however, teaches us that if we deny Jesus' resurrection from the dead, we are not Christians at all.
The New Morality:
The Bible clearly teaches that fornication is a sin. This includes extramarital and premarital sexual intercourse. Homosexuality is condemned in Scripture, both the lust for it and the act itself. There is forgiveness for the penitent adulterer and the penitent homosexual. The Holy Spirit gives power to the repentant Christian to amend his sinful life and change his ways.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the view that extramarital and premarital sexual relations are not always sinful, and that homosexuality is an alternate lifestyle. Many ELCA leaders are even willing to accept the idea of homosexual pastors, that is, pastors who openly promote homosexuality and practice it in their lives. An ELCA study document says: "No (Bible) passage specifically addresses the question facing the church today: the morality of a just, loving, committed relationship between persons of the same sex."
One ELCA statement declares: “This church recognizes that there can be sound reasons for ending a pregnancy through induced abortion.” Among such reasons they lists threats to the physical life of the mother, cases of rape or incest, and the likelihood of fetal abnormalities.
Another ELCA statement says: “We question whether the death penalty can be administered justly. … We oppose the death penalty.”
The Way to Heaven:
The Bible clearly teaches that there is only one way to be saved. Jesus is the Way; no one goes to the Father except through Him. He is the only Savior for all mankind. Those who die without faith in Him are lost eternally.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the increasingly popular view that sincere followers of non-Christian religions may also get to heaven. In fact, universalism is very popular today: namely, the view that eventually all will go to heaven, and that there is no eternal hell.
Other Doctrines and Practices:
The ELCA calls itself Lutheran, but the above paragraphs give evidence that the ELCA is not confessionally Lutheran, by any means. The ELCA practices fellowship with many non-Lutherans. Joint services with Roman Catholic churches are not uncommon. Almost all ELCA churches practice open communion; that is, the Lord's Supper is given to anyone who happens to be present at a service. The practice of infant communion is gaining headway. The practice of woman suffrage is probably universal in the ELCA; the ELCA makes no distinction between men and women in their calling of pastors and teachers.
At its 1997 convention the ELCA adopted a formula of agreement with the following non-Lutheran church bodies: The Presbyterian Church (USA); the Reformed Church in America; the United Church of Christ. This agreement means that all of these church bodies consider themselves in full communion with one another. This agreement ignores or makes light of the historical doctrinal differences between Lutherans and other Protestants. These doctrinal differences have not been resolved on the basis of Scripture. Rather, they have been ignored. But in fact these churches are in basic agreement that the Bible is not the Word of God, and therefore they can be sure of no doctrine, nor do they really have a doctrinal position anymore.
In August of 1999 the ELCA approved full communion with the Episcopalian Church. The agreement makes provision for all ELCA pastors in the future to be ordained by a bishop in the “historic episcopate.” This agreement makes necessary something that is certainly not commanded in Scripture as being necessary: namely, ordination by a bishop who has in turn been ordained by someone who can trace his ordination back to the apostles. At the same time the ELCA likewise approved full communion with the Moravian Church in America.
On October 31, 1999 representatives of the ELCA were on hand in Augsburg, Germany to sign a document together with representatives of the Roman Catholic Church. The document declares that Lutherans and Catholics are basically agreed on the doctrine of justification by faith. This agreement is made possible by the fact that certain words such as “grace” and “justification” are not clearly defined. The Roman Catholic representatives said that there is nothing in the document that differs from the decisions of the Council of Trent. Since the Council of Trent plainly cursed the teaching of justification by faith alone, without the deeds of the law, it is clear that this agreement does not at all resolve any doctrinal differences. Nevertheless, the leaders in the ELCA hail the agreement as a historic resolution of the conflict between Lutherans and the Roman Catholic Church. What it really indicates is that the ELCA and its sister congregations in the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) are no longer confessional Lutheran church bodies. (Confer the last section in these pages, entitled “Associations of Church Bodies.”)
Some congregations in the ELCA are protesting against various actions of the ELCA, chiefly the agreement with the Episcopal Church that brings the ELCA into conformity with the so-called apostolic succession. At least 63 congregations have formed a group called Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (LCMC). Congregations who affiliate with the LCMC may at the same time be members of the ELCA or some other Lutheran church body. A look at the LCMC constitution indicates that the LCMC is not opposed to women pastors.
“The Eleventh Biennial Churchwide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) was held Aug. 17-23, 2009 at the Minneapolis Convention Center. About 2,300 people participated, including 1,045 voting members. The theme was ‘God's work. Our hands.’
Resolution 1: Adopted by a vote of 619-402: ‘Resolved, that the ELCA commit itself to finding ways to allow congregations that choose to do so to recognize, support and hold publicly accountable lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships.’
Resolution 2: Adopted by a vote of 559-451: ‘Resolved, that the ELCA commit itself to finding a way for people in such publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships to serve as rostered leaders of this church’” (http://www.elca.org/Who-We-Are/Our-Three-Expressions/Churchwide-Organization/Office-of-the-Secretary/ELCA-Governance/Churchwide-Assembly/Actions/Voting.aspx).
As Lutherans we should note carefully what the ELCA teaches in it’s seminaries and churches. People are likely to associate our church with this synod (more or less) simply because of our common name “Lutheran”. When you become familiar with the range and depth of false teaching tolerated in the ELCA this becomes frightening.
The Following notes are from former ILC Professor David Lau’s comparative religions course. The ELCA seminary textbook often referenced is volume two of “Christian Dogmatics” by Braaten and Jenson. I believe that these references can also be found in the book "What's Going On among the Lutherans?" by Patsy A. Leppien.
Lutheran Divisions Begin Early:
After Luther's death there was a long period of bitter quarreling among his followers. They could not agree among themselves on what the Bible taught or what Luther taught. This quarreling among the Lutherans permitted other groups to gain ground: the Roman Catholics, the Calvinists, and the Anabaptists. Sad to say, one of the chief causes for the quarreling was that Philip Melanchthon, Luther's good friend, did not remain altogether faithful in his teaching. Melanchthon allowed false teaching in the doctrines of conversion and the Lord's Supper, and this led to serious problems.
Finally in 1577 the Formula of Concord was written by Martin Chemnitz (the second Martin) and Jacob Andreae and others as a confession of true Bible teaching on the matters that had been argued about by the Lutherans. Loyal Lutherans were able to unite on the Formula of Concord as a faithful summary of Bible teaching, as Luther had taught it. Those Lutherans that truly accept the Formula of Concord can be called orthodox Lutherans or confessional Lutherans.
Although Luther himself taught the difference between church and government, the Lutheran churches in Germany and Norway and Denmark and Sweden became churches that were supported and partly controlled by the government. This worked out all right as long as the rulers themselves were orthodox Lutherans. But in the long run the close bond between church and state proved to be a negative factor that hurt the cause of Lutheranism in Europe.
Today these European countries list millions of persons calling themselves Lutherans, but only a very small percentage actually participate in worship or actively confess their faith. There are also some Lutheran free churches in Europe, but these too are no longer faithful to the teachings of the Bible.
What went wrong between 1577 and 1999? At first the teaching was orthodox and confessional, but not enough emphasis was placed on living the Christian life and practicing Christian discipline (admonition, excommunication).
Then, in an effort to improve the Christian life, there arose the Lutheran pietists, who were something like the Methodists in England in their emphasis on holy living. The pietists believed that the teaching of true doctrine was relatively unimportant. What counted was deeds, not creeds. Unfortunately the pietists made rules for holy living that went beyond the Bible. For example, playing cards was considered sinful by the pietists.
The pietists were followed by the rationalists who were especially strong in the late 1700s and early 1800s. The rationalists were willing to accept only those Bible teachings that agreed with their reason. But when you omit the miracles from Scripture, there is very little left.
In the late 1800s and early 1900s there was a resurgence of confessional Lutheranism in Europe and America, but at this time in history (2003) there is very little confessional Lutheranism alive anywhere in the world. The following basic Bible teachings are being denied in full or in part by the vast majority of Lutherans in the world today:
1. The six-day creation of the world;
2. The verbal inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible;
3. Justification by faith in Christ without the deeds of the law;
4. The real presence of Christ's body and blood in the Lord's Supper;
5. The doctrine of original sin and total depravity;
6. Man's inability to cooperate in his own conversion;
7. God's command to avoid all supporters of false teaching.
According to a Barna Group poll (Modern Reformation, May-June 2002) only 21% of Lutherans nationwide agree that people do not earn their way to heaven by their good works. Only 33% of Lutherans believe that Jesus was without sin.
What we teach at Immanuel Lutheran College in Eau Claire on the basis of the Bible and in agreement with our Lutheran confessions is not taught by many Lutherans in the world today.
Lesson 35
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA)
Lutherans began to come to America as early as 1624. They settled in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York at first, later in Georgia and South Carolina and the upper midwest: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, North Dakota. Some of the Lutheran settlers were confessional Lutherans, but most of them were greatly influenced by pietism and rationalism. One of the early leaders was Henry Melchior Muhlenberg, who organized some of the early Lutherans into a church body.
There have been many different Lutheran church bodies in America through the years: General Synod, Tennessee Synod, Ohio Synod, General Council, Iowa Synod, Norwegian Synod, Augustana Synod, American Lutheran Church. But today the majority of Lutherans are found in one very large church body known as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), which began its existence in 1988. The membership of the ELCA is 5,038,006, with 17,706 clergy. Most of the large Lutheran congregations in Eau Claire are members of the ELCA: First Lutheran, Grace Lutheran, Trinity Lutheran, St. John's Lutheran, Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd, Immanuel Lutheran, Hope Lutheran, Our Savior's Lutheran. In Canada the largest Lutheran church body is the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada (ELCIC), which has 199,236 members, with 866 clergy. This church body also tolerates all kinds of false teaching and ungodly behavior.
The ELCA claims that it is a Lutheran church and that it honors the Lutheran confessions. But what is actually taught and practiced by these churches is not confessional Lutheranism. Several recent books supply the evidence that the ELCA is a grossly false-teaching church body. The information printed in the following paragraphs is taken mainly from two books: What's Going On Among the Lutherans? (1992) and WELS and Other Lutherans (1995).
The Inspiration and Inerrancy of Scripture:
The Bible itself teaches that all Scripture has been breathed out by God and is therefore inspired. Since all of Scripture is God's Word, it is clear that all of it is true. There are no errors or contradictions in the Bible. We therefore confess that the Bible is God's Word; to say merely that the Bible contains God's Word is insufficient.
The dominant position in the ELCA is that there are human errors and contradictions in the Bible. We may call the Bible "inspired" but we may also call the traditions of the church "inspired" or the testimony of Christians today "inspired." When the ELCA was organized, its founders very carefully and deliberately left out any reference to the Bible as the "inerrant" Word of God. None of its seminary teachers or leaders proclaim that the Bible is truth in everything that it says. This, of course, influences everything else that the ELCA does. When a doctrinal controversy arises, the ELCA has no final court of appeal, that is, no inerrant Bible from which to draw its teachings and practices.
An ELCA textbook indicates what is being taught in ELCA schools: "Today it is impossible to assume the historicity of the things recorded. What the biblical authors report is not accepted as a literal transcript of the factual course of events. Therefore, critical scholars inquire behind the text and attempt to reconstruct the real history that took place."
Creation:
The Bible teaches that God created all things, including man, in six ordinary days. Therefore to say that man evolved from lower forms of life is plainly contrary to Scripture. It is also clear from Scripture that Adam and Eve were real persons, and that their fall into sin took place just as Genesis describes it.
Most ELCA teachers, however, consider the story of creation in Genesis to be a myth. That is, it is a nice story to try to explain how we got here, but, of course, it did not really happen. The ELCA tolerates and even promotes the concept of theistic evolution: that is, that God created things by means of evolution. Adam and Eve are presented as symbols of humanity, not real people. Other stories in the Bible, such as the stories of Noah, Jonah, and Job are also myths intended to teach some moral lesson. Of course, they are not factual.
The Five Books of Moses:
Jesus Himself taught that the first five books of the Bible were written by Moses.
The ELCA, however, is dominated by teachers who believe that the first five books of the Bible were written centuries after Moses died. They follow the so-called historical-critical approach, which claims that the first five books of the Bible and later books as well were derived from various sources commonly identified as J, E, D, and P.
The Words of Jesus:
As disciples of Christ, we of course believe that Jesus actually said all the statements attributed to Him in the New Testament. He Himself said that He would give the Holy Spirit to His apostles to remind them of the things He had said to them, so that we might know them and come to faith in Christ through these words.
Many teachers in the ELCA, however, take the position that most of the statements attributed to Jesus in the Gospels were not actually spoken by Him but were added to the Bible by early Christians in their desire to honor their Lord. Of course, this means in plain English that they were liars. Perhaps you have heard of the "Jesus Seminar." This is a group of scholars who are putting out a book of five Gospels (including a Gospel of Thomas with the usual four) that claim to separate the real teachings of Jesus from the teachings that are found in the Gospels. These scholars have concluded, for example, that the only word of the Lord's Prayer that Jesus actually said was the word "Father." The ELCA also is represented among the scholars of the "Jesus Seminar."
The Virgin Birth of Christ:
The Bible teaches clearly that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, and that therefore He did not have a biological father on this earth.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the view that Jesus was not born of a virgin, but that later Christians ascribed His birth to a virgin in order to honor His name. The real facts in the story are that Joseph may have been His father, or perhaps a Roman soldier was His father. The ELCA textbook says about the virgin birth: "It is important not to get bogged down in biology, but to read it as a symbol witnessing the truth of the kerygma."
The Deity of Christ:
The Bible teaches clearly in many places that Jesus is God, even as we confess in the Nicene Creed.
Many in the ELCA, however, are willing to concede that the doctrine of Jesus' deity is not taught in the Bible but that it was a doctrine developed by the early Christians in order to honor Jesus. On this point the ELCA textbook says: "The notion of the preexistent Son of God becoming a human being in the womb of a virgin and then returning to his heavenly home is bound up with the mythological picture of the world that clashes with our modern scientific world view." And again the textbook says: "The preexistence of Christ is an integral part of the myth of the incarnation." We have to realize that when ELCA theologians talk about Jesus being God, they do not really mean that Jesus was and is true God from all eternity. They mean only that He is given the name of God in order to honor Him as someone special.
The Atonement:
We believe, as the Bible teaches, that God punished Jesus on the cross in our place. Jesus died for our sins as our Substitute. God forgives us our sins for Christ's sake, that is, because Jesus died in our place. Jesus was our Substitute also in His life, keeping the law of God and being perfectly obedient throughout His life.
Many ELCA theologians, however, teach only that Jesus died for us as a man might die for his friends. They do not want to think that God would be so "unjust" as to punish Jesus for our sins. One ELCA theologian taught in an ELCA textbook: "Jesus came and died because God is merciful, not to make God merciful. We killed him because he forgave sins, not to make forgiveness possible."
The Resurrection:
The tomb was empty on Sunday morning, because Jesus rose physically from the dead and showed Himself alive to His disciples. Our bodies also will rise from the dead on the Last Day.
Some ELCA teachers, however, present Jesus' resurrection as a spiritual resurrection, not as a physical resurrection. Whether the tomb was empty or not is no concern to them. They would maintain that we can believe in Jesus' resurrection even if His body remains in its tomb. One graduate from an ELCA seminary claims that when he graduated from the seminary, he did not believe in Jesus' physical resurrection, nor did most of his classmates, nor did any of his teachers. The Bible, however, teaches us that if we deny Jesus' resurrection from the dead, we are not Christians at all.
The New Morality:
The Bible clearly teaches that fornication is a sin. This includes extramarital and premarital sexual intercourse. Homosexuality is condemned in Scripture, both the lust for it and the act itself. There is forgiveness for the penitent adulterer and the penitent homosexual. The Holy Spirit gives power to the repentant Christian to amend his sinful life and change his ways.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the view that extramarital and premarital sexual relations are not always sinful, and that homosexuality is an alternate lifestyle. Many ELCA leaders are even willing to accept the idea of homosexual pastors, that is, pastors who openly promote homosexuality and practice it in their lives. An ELCA study document says: "No (Bible) passage specifically addresses the question facing the church today: the morality of a just, loving, committed relationship between persons of the same sex."
One ELCA statement declares: “This church recognizes that there can be sound reasons for ending a pregnancy through induced abortion.” Among such reasons they lists threats to the physical life of the mother, cases of rape or incest, and the likelihood of fetal abnormalities.
Another ELCA statement says: “We question whether the death penalty can be administered justly. … We oppose the death penalty.”
The Way to Heaven:
The Bible clearly teaches that there is only one way to be saved. Jesus is the Way; no one goes to the Father except through Him. He is the only Savior for all mankind. Those who die without faith in Him are lost eternally.
The ELCA, however, tolerates the increasingly popular view that sincere followers of non-Christian religions may also get to heaven. In fact, universalism is very popular today: namely, the view that eventually all will go to heaven, and that there is no eternal hell.
Other Doctrines and Practices:
The ELCA calls itself Lutheran, but the above paragraphs give evidence that the ELCA is not confessionally Lutheran, by any means. The ELCA practices fellowship with many non-Lutherans. Joint services with Roman Catholic churches are not uncommon. Almost all ELCA churches practice open communion; that is, the Lord's Supper is given to anyone who happens to be present at a service. The practice of infant communion is gaining headway. The practice of woman suffrage is probably universal in the ELCA; the ELCA makes no distinction between men and women in their calling of pastors and teachers.
At its 1997 convention the ELCA adopted a formula of agreement with the following non-Lutheran church bodies: The Presbyterian Church (USA); the Reformed Church in America; the United Church of Christ. This agreement means that all of these church bodies consider themselves in full communion with one another. This agreement ignores or makes light of the historical doctrinal differences between Lutherans and other Protestants. These doctrinal differences have not been resolved on the basis of Scripture. Rather, they have been ignored. But in fact these churches are in basic agreement that the Bible is not the Word of God, and therefore they can be sure of no doctrine, nor do they really have a doctrinal position anymore.
In August of 1999 the ELCA approved full communion with the Episcopalian Church. The agreement makes provision for all ELCA pastors in the future to be ordained by a bishop in the “historic episcopate.” This agreement makes necessary something that is certainly not commanded in Scripture as being necessary: namely, ordination by a bishop who has in turn been ordained by someone who can trace his ordination back to the apostles. At the same time the ELCA likewise approved full communion with the Moravian Church in America.
On October 31, 1999 representatives of the ELCA were on hand in Augsburg, Germany to sign a document together with representatives of the Roman Catholic Church. The document declares that Lutherans and Catholics are basically agreed on the doctrine of justification by faith. This agreement is made possible by the fact that certain words such as “grace” and “justification” are not clearly defined. The Roman Catholic representatives said that there is nothing in the document that differs from the decisions of the Council of Trent. Since the Council of Trent plainly cursed the teaching of justification by faith alone, without the deeds of the law, it is clear that this agreement does not at all resolve any doctrinal differences. Nevertheless, the leaders in the ELCA hail the agreement as a historic resolution of the conflict between Lutherans and the Roman Catholic Church. What it really indicates is that the ELCA and its sister congregations in the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) are no longer confessional Lutheran church bodies. (Confer the last section in these pages, entitled “Associations of Church Bodies.”)
Some congregations in the ELCA are protesting against various actions of the ELCA, chiefly the agreement with the Episcopal Church that brings the ELCA into conformity with the so-called apostolic succession. At least 63 congregations have formed a group called Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (LCMC). Congregations who affiliate with the LCMC may at the same time be members of the ELCA or some other Lutheran church body. A look at the LCMC constitution indicates that the LCMC is not opposed to women pastors.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Why did the posts stop?
Greetings in Christ,
Our Bible Class has moved into a study of Paul's letter to the Galatian Christians. This particular study is hands on and interactive instead of "handout" based where the pastor does the study and communicates it to the group. The hope is to familiarize everyone with the message contained in Galatians while also getting some experience with various methods and tools for studying the Bible. This type of study doesn't really lend itself to blogs. Though I'll summarize our study of chapter 1 and get in out by next Sunday. Currently we're a study or two away from finishing chapter 2. Please join us if you can - Bible Class starts at 10am in the downstairs fellowship room of Redemption Church.
God bless your own meditation in His Word.
In His service,
-Pastor Caleb Schaller
Our Bible Class has moved into a study of Paul's letter to the Galatian Christians. This particular study is hands on and interactive instead of "handout" based where the pastor does the study and communicates it to the group. The hope is to familiarize everyone with the message contained in Galatians while also getting some experience with various methods and tools for studying the Bible. This type of study doesn't really lend itself to blogs. Though I'll summarize our study of chapter 1 and get in out by next Sunday. Currently we're a study or two away from finishing chapter 2. Please join us if you can - Bible Class starts at 10am in the downstairs fellowship room of Redemption Church.
God bless your own meditation in His Word.
In His service,
-Pastor Caleb Schaller
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
